The curtain will rise on the 2008 Democratic National Convention in less than two weeks. In a conference call with reporters, Convention Co-Chair, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, previewed the nightly themes for what she promised will be “an exciting and innovative convention, one like we’ve never seen before in America.”
On the other side of town, some Hillary Clinton supporters previewed a different kind of party.
The Denver Group was formed to ensure “the Democratic National Committee respect and carry out the democratic process at the convention in Denver this August by meeting certain specific goals.” In a newspaper ad, “Will Howard Dean and the DNC turn the Democratic Party into the Boston Tea Party,” they boldly declare:
Senator Clinton’s name must be placed in nomination. Her supporters must be allowed to make speeches on behalf of her candidacy. There must be a true and honest roll call vote with each candidate given an equal chance to win the nomination.
If Democratic processes and principles are not respected, if attempts are made to turn the convention into a coronation instead of choosing a nominee according to Democratic rules and principles, then the party will have a much bigger problem – a genuine revolt of more than 18 million voters. And then, come November, there will be a lot more than tea going over the side.
I asked the group’s co-founder, Heidi Li Feldman, whether they will continue to press for a roll call vote in light of Clinton’s primetime speaking role. In an email, Feldman wrote:
The Denver Group will press for Senator Clinton's name to be put in nomination followed by truly competitive roll call vote, because we know that whichever candidate were to win such a vote would be more likely to attract enough votes in November to secure a Democratic victory, which is our ultimate hope.
Feldman dismissed fears that a divided party undermines Barack Obama’s chances of winning the general election:
The Denver Group is concerned that a facade of unity, rather than genuine support earned via a truly competitive roll call vote at the Convention, will undermine any Democratic presidential contender's chance to win in November.
Meanwhile, Clinton’s former communications director Howard Wolfson told ABC News that John Edwards’ lie about an extramarital affair cost Clinton the nomination:
I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee. Our voters and Edwards' voters were the same people. They were older, pro-union. Not all, but maybe two-thirds of them would have been for us and we would have barely beaten Obama.
The Clinton-Obama drama continues. Stay tuned.